Engineering & Mining Journal

MAY 2018

Engineering and Mining Journal - Whether the market is copper, gold, nickel, iron ore, lead/zinc, PGM, diamonds or other commodities, E&MJ takes the lead in projecting trends, following development and reporting on the most efficient operating pr

Issue link: https://emj.epubxp.com/i/981569

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 45 of 67

NIOSH VIBRATION 44 E&MJ; • MAY 2018 www.e-mj.com www.Derrick.com Derrick W56 Trash Screen removing carbon at 600 microns Increase Gold Recovery, Reduce Costs, Improve Performance & Efficiency, and Equipment Reliability Derrick ® offers solutions for fine screening in gold processing plants that effectively address all of these objectives. Whether your application is cyclone overflow trash duty, tailings carbon safety, in-tank interstage carbon retention, de-gritting, loaded carbon, carbon sizing, carbon dewatering, gravity separation, or carbon column safety, Derrick has a proven solution for you. Derrick screening machines – equipped with long-lasting, non-blinding Polyweb ® urethane surfaces – offer the highest screen throughput in the smallest available footprint. D E R R I C K ® U R E T H A N E S C R E E N S ® Contact Derrick today to discover how you can increase efficiency and profits! been clearly documented. Those levels within the HGCZ indicate caution with respect to potential health risks. The exposure limit value (ELV) is the level above which health risks are likely. Ta- bles 1 and 2 display the EAVs and ELVs in terms of aw and VDV. Results Figures 2 and 3 are the graphical dis- plays of a w and VDV in the vertical di- rection and the percent difference be- tween the Siemens/LMS and the iPod measured at the seat and normalized for an 8-hour exposure duration. The figures indicate good agreement between the two systems for the selected equipment. Absolute differences in percent for a w (8) measures comparing the Siemens/ LMS and iPod measurement systems ranged from 0.1 to 8.5. Twelve of the 13 instances showed percent differences of 4.2% or less. Absolute differences in percent for VDV (8) measures comparing the Sie- mens/LMS and iPod measurement sys- tems ranged from 0.3% to 18.8%. Elev- Figure 2—A w measured in the vertical direction at the seat and normalized to an 8-hr shift for equipment ID Nos. shown above. Figure 3—VDV measured in the vertical direction at the seat and normalized to an 8-hr shift for equipment ID Nos. shown above.

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Engineering & Mining Journal - MAY 2018